Court orders Google to compensate politician who lost political career over defamatory YouTube videos
Google has previously been found guilty of defamation, typically for providing links to articles in search results, but Monday’s ruling is one of the first where the company has been found to be an active publisher – via YouTube – of content defaming an elected official.
Related News

YouTube could be liable for unauthorized uploads if it delays action, German court rules
India mulls panel to hear calls against social media takedowns
In Australia, a review of defamation law examines whether online platforms should be held liable for the defamatory content they host. Google and other Internet giants say they cannot reasonably be expected to monitor all messages.
A Google spokesperson was unavailable for comment.
Related News

Google will merge Google Meet and Google Duo
Is Google anti-dalit? From Canceling Dalit Leader to Native American Employee Forced to Resign
By continuing to publish the content, Google violated its own policies to protect public figures from unfair targets and “prematurely ousted Mr. Barilaro from his chosen service in public life and significantly traumatized him,” it said. declared rare.
Barilaro quit politics a year after Shanks posted the videos, and “Google cannot escape liability for the substantial damage caused by Mr. Shanks’ campaign,” Rares added.
But Shanks “needed YouTube to spread its poison (and) Google was willing to join Mr. Shanks in doing so to generate revenue as part of its business model,” the judge said.
Before the lawsuit was resolved, Shanks had continued to publicly attack Barilaro and his lawyers, and the judge said he would refer him and Google to authorities “for what appears to be serious contempt of court by exercising undue pressure … not to pursue this procedure”.
In a post on Facebook after the decision, Shanks, who goes by the friendlyjordies handle, mocked Barilaro, saying “you finally scored the Google coin… never having the truth tested in court.”
Shanks added, without evidence, that Barilaro “withdrew (his) action against us so that we would not testify or present our evidence” in support of his claims.
Barilaro told reporters outside the courthouse that he felt “exonerated and vindicated”.
“It was never about the money,” he said. “It was an apology, a dismissal. Of course, now an apology is worth nothing after the campaign continued. It took a court to force Google’s hand.”
($1 = 1.3883 Australian dollars)
(1 Australian dollar = 55.94 Indian rupee)
Comments are closed.