Nevada County Supervisors Respond to Notice of Recall Intent – YubaNet

All five Nevada County supervisors have received a notice of intent to recall. They filed their responses to the notice, one of the stages in a recall process. Here are their responses.

Heidi Hall – District 1

This recall petition for Supervisor Heidi Hall makes allegations that are patently false and misleading, and has a mistaken understanding of how the county works. The county has a duty to respect the rule of law in the implementation of public health mandates and to support our healthcare professionals who follow the best medical advice available. We did this while simultaneously using state and federal funding to provide an unprecedented level of support (approximately $ 5.8 million ARPA; $ 3 million from the CARES Act) to our local businesses, non-profit organizations. profit and cultural institutions to help them overcome the economic fallout from the pandemic. In addition, this particular council has succeeded in: building more low-income housing, providing services and housing for our homeless population, expanding broadband, doubling our vegetation management, prevention and control efforts. response to forest fires; ensuring fiscal stability while expanding our mental health services, modernizing our roads, coordinating with our city and towns, supporting legal cannabis while strengthening enforcement against illegal crops and providing comprehensive assistance to voters. This reminder will cost from $ 95,000 to $ 250,000 in taxes per supervisor. None of your rights have been violated and our public health actions exist to protect the community.

Ed Scofield – District 2

COVID has forced governments of all sizes to make tough decisions. The County, through your Supervisory Board, has upheld the rule of law in implementing public health mandates and supporting our healthcare professionals who follow the best medical advice available. We did this by using local, state and federal funding to provide an unprecedented level of support to our local businesses, nonprofits, and cultural institutions to help them weather the economic fallout from the crisis. pandemic. Throughout the pandemic, your watchdog continued the work of the county government. The Council has succeeded in building more low-income housing, providing services and housing to the homeless, expanding broadband, doubling our efforts in vegetation management, forest fire prevention and response. ; ensuring fiscal stability while expanding our mental health services, modernizing our roads, supporting legal cannabis while strengthening law enforcement against illegal crops and providing comprehensive assistance to voters. This recall petition is unwarranted, a waste of your government time and a waste of your taxpayer’s money.

Dan Miller – District 3

I have spent 31 years in the public service, making evidence-based decisions to best serve the people I represent.

I have helped lead efforts to provide more than $ 1 million in federal, state and local funding for Covid-19 to businesses and nonprofits in the Third District. I supported the county environmental health department on strategies that have kept businesses open despite excessive state shutdown orders. I pressured the county public health official, in person and in writing, to lift the arrest and quarantine warrants when the facts showed they were ineffective.

This reminder is an emotional response and a desperate effort from a marginal minority who did not get what they wanted. Their claims lack credibility and do not stand the test of truth.

For example, drones don’t perform “warrantless searches,” they are a tool in the county’s efforts to identify and eliminate illegal cannabis crops.

I did not allow “crimes against humanity”, I sought to protect the health of citizens in the face of a deadly virus. I have fully supported the use of therapy as a medical response for those who have contracted the virus.

Partisan politics has never influenced my decisions. I ask the voters of the third district to reject the recall.

Sue Hoek – District 4

This recall is divisive, costly and unnecessary. It will cost District 4 taxpayers up to $ 250,000, money better spent on fire safety, schools and supporting local businesses. This seat is up for election in June 2022, where voters will have the opportunity to vote in a regular election for the candidate of their choice.

The petition makes false and misleading claims. The county has a duty to respect the rule of law in the implementation of public health mandates. We have done so while providing unprecedented support to local businesses, nonprofits and cultural institutions to help them survive this pandemic. This BOS has succeeded in building social housing, in extending broadband, in doubling the management of forest fire vegetation; ensuring fiscal stability while expanding mental health services, improving roads, coordinating with our city and towns, supporting legal cannabis while strengthening law enforcement against illegal cultivation and providing a full assistance to voters.

This recall attempt divides the community at a time when we need more cooperation and unity. We are stronger together.

Hardy Bullock – District 5

This recall petition makes false, unfounded, misleading and entirely fabricated and unfounded claims. This recall will cost taxpayers $ 492,000 to $ 685,000.

The petitioners do not understand how local government works. The county has a duty to respect the rule of law in the implementation of public health mandates and to support our healthcare professionals who follow the best medical advice available. We have done this while simultaneously using CARES / ARPA state and federal government funding to provide an unprecedented level of support, $ 8,800,000, to our local businesses, nonprofits, and communities. our cultural and educational institutions to help them overcome the economic fallout from the pandemic. This supervisory board has succeeded in building housing for low-income people, providing services to the homeless, expanding broadband, doubling forest fire mitigation efforts, ensuring fiscal stability, expanding mental health services, upgrading roads, supporting legal cannabis, strengthening enforcement of illegal crops, coordinating with our towns and cities, and providing assistance to voters.

This petition is an attack on the community and residents of Nevada County based on conspiracy theories and myths. Don’t be fooled. Knowledge is power-Visit NevadaCountyFacts.org to learn the truth. I remain focused on Nevada County service.


Source link

Comments are closed.